|
|
Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum
rules before posting.
Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free
registration is required.
If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.
|
|
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 4 ...13 Previous Next
|
Following the Rules (Locked) |
|
|
|
Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Perhaps god-like tactics, berak. Since he seems to think that he can freely create any interpretation of the Rules that suits his fancy and then he is following it and them, when he is not following the Rules. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting goblinsdoitall: Quote: Oooops, didn't think about that. Just contributed a bunch of ADR-group, following the line of this user, there were even some quite well known actors appearing in this list. Since it already got accepted, I will consequently change this back.
Just one last comment: Skip, wasn't it you to tell us that Hollywood gives a f*** about our definitions? So it's really not for the sake of the discussion, but because I really don't understand it: Why exactly is someone who is giving a "Voice only"-performance not a member of the cast? I can still remember the discussion about "appearances" which were credited in the crew section and here it was widely accepted that these should belong to the cast. Where is the difference? Goblins: As Neil noted we spelled out what the Cast was in the Rules. We have tried to be somewhat liberal to allow some of the variations that Hollywood displays such as Additional Voices and so forth. However, ADR is not an acting credit, it is a SOUND Dept. credit, as are Foley Editors, one could argue that they are also performers, Stunt people are not included except under a narrow set of circumstances, they also could be argued to be performers. Simply put this particular user created HIS own interpretation and then tried to force it on everyone, with his sheltering comment "I follow the Rules". His sleight of mind finally was caught and hopefully he spend some time UNDOING the damage he has caused by forcing HIS Rules and HIS preferences on the Online. I for one don't trust his work, and look at it very carefully, and ANYTHING that is edited by him has very little chance of finding its way into MY database, which does indeed follow the Rules as they were intended. Skip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video |
| Registered: March 29, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,479 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Berak: Quote:
Sorry - don't know how else to properly explain it... Properly explain it ??? Gestapo ??? Do you really measure what means what you wrote? Gestapo was directly responsible of the death in gas chambers of thousands people, including women and children. Even if you disagree with another user, NOTHING can allow you to use such a comparison. I read somewhere that those forums were moderated... hum... I can see that nothing changes here... | | | Images from movies |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,366 |
| | Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 844 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Daddy DVD: Quote: Quoting DJ Doena:
Quote: Could you give me a few examples of these ADRs? From the movie American Beauty:
Great Example, thank you. now LEAVE THEM OUT! |
| Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,730 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr Pavlov: Quote: Goblins:
As Neil noted we spelled out what the Cast was in the Rules. We have tried to be somewhat liberal to allow some of the variations that Hollywood displays such as Additional Voices and so forth. However, ADR is not an acting credit, it is a SOUND Dept. credit, as are Foley Editors, one could argue that they are also performers, Stunt people are not included except under a narrow set of circumstances, they also could be argued to be performers.
Simply put this particular user created HIS own interpretation and then tried to force it on everyone, with his sheltering comment "I follow the Rules". His sleight of mind finally was caught and hopefully he spend some time UNDOING the damage he has caused by forcing HIS Rules and HIS preferences on the Online. I for one don't trust his work, and look at it very carefully, and ANYTHING that is edited by him has very little chance of finding its way into MY database, which does indeed follow the Rules as they were intended.
Skip You got me with the "Stunt Performers". That's what I understood. I somewhat lost you on the "acting credit" (probably it's my english), but if I get this correctly then this would mean that any credit for someone not actually appearing on screen (acting) is invalid. Thought this to the end and asked myself: "What might the Voice-checkbox be for?". So I'm sure it's just a misunderstanding of mine. Thanks again for the explanation (the one with the Stunt Performers). | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up! But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 |
| Registered: April 3, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,998 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting DJ Doena: Quote: Could you give me a few examples of these ADRs? Knocked Up Theodore Borders [Theo Borders] IMDb has him in Miscellaneous Crew not Cast | | | Last edited: by ninehours |
| Registered: May 26, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,879 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting goblinsdoitall: Quote:
You got me with the "Stunt Performers". That's what I understood. I somewhat lost you on the "acting credit" (probably it's my english), but if I get this correctly then this would mean that any credit for someone not actually appearing on screen (acting) is invalid. Thought this to the end and asked myself: "What might the Voice-checkbox be for?". So I'm sure it's just a misunderstanding of mine.
Thanks again for the explanation (the one with the Stunt Performers). If I'm right in my understanding of things here, it's not that they are voice-only actors, it's that their work is listed with the sound department rather than with the cast. So animated films have a cast list - and those actors are voice only and listed as cast. Or someone listed as narrator or something similar is possibly a voice only performance. Had one of those recently myself. But ADR Voices are listed with the sound department, so are not considered part of the cast, just like those stunt performers. | | | If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. -- Thorin Oakenshield | | | Last edited: by Danae Cassandra |
| | Berak | Bibamus morieundum est! |
Registered: May 10, 2007 | Posts: 1,059 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting surfeur51: Quote: Quoting Berak:
Quote:
Sorry - don't know how else to properly explain it...
Properly explain it ??? Gestapo ???
Do you really measure what means what you wrote? Gestapo was directly responsible of the death in gas chambers of thousands people, including women and children. Even if you disagree with another user, NOTHING can allow you to use such a comparison.
I read somewhere that those forums were moderated... hum...
I can see that nothing changes here... I'll leave it to you, Yves, to take something completely out of context... | | | Berak
It's better to burn out than to fade away! True love conquers all! |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,366 |
| Posted: | | | | In all these credits I often read "ADR Voice Casting" above these groups, sometimes I even read "ADR Cast" as a header. So I ask myself: If these aren't "Cast" then why are they casted? | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands | | | Last edited: by Daddy DVD |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,245 |
| Posted: | | | | But one thing I noticed from the screencaps. There is a credit about them for "ADR Voice Casting" or "Voice Casting".
Going by that I think it means that the ADR Voice groups was "Cast" in the film. Wouldn't the Sound Crew (ADR Voices) be hired and not cast?
Regarding the cast being from one group, then why do we allow "Additional Voices" that are sometime minutes apart from the main cast to be credited? If we were to really follow the rules to the letter than I don't think those would be allowed either. |
| Registered: June 12, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,665 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Daddy DVD: Quote: In all these credits I often read "ADR Voice Casting" above these groups, sometimes I even read "ADR Cast" as a header. So I ask myself: If these aren't "Cast" then why are they casted? Perhaps it is called voice casting because of inertia. ("We've always done it that way") Perhaps because certain sounds/noises are desired and not just anyone can do it. And your question works both ways...if they are "cast" why aren't they listed with The Cast? | | | Bad movie? You're soaking in it! |
| Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,745 |
| Posted: | | | | OK, I've read it up on wikipedia, but where's the difference between a standard voice cast (e.g. in an animated movie or James Earl Jones in Star Wars) and these ADRs? For example: Why has Amerian Beauty so many ADRs? What have they been doing? | | | Karsten DVD Collectors Online
|
| Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 940 |
| Posted: | | | | The ADR group of "actors" is in the Sound Crew section of the credits because they are crew. They might be doing voice over for a piece of film where the audio was not good enough, but they might also be voicing sound effects. There is really no way to tell by looking at the credit exactly what the people listed under ADR actually "voiced." IMO the significance of having a list of 47 (Flushed Away) names all credited as ADR is more than a little worthless. As to the use of the term ADR Voice Casting, well, that would mean those voices were chosen (hired) because of the characteristics of the voice in question. Could be a particularly blood-curdling scream, or a maniacal laughter, but it is still a sound effect, and not a Cast Role they are hired for.
Actors credited outside the full cast list, Peter Jackson's kids in LOTR come to mind, are a different story. They have a role credited, so IMO they are perfectly acceptable to add to the cast list.
I could go either way on Additional Voices listed outside the main cast list. While I can understand the desire to have "every credit for every actor" listed in Profiler, I still don't see a whole lot of added value in knowing that John Doe was an additional voice in any particular film. | | | Kevin |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Daddy DVD: Quote: In all these credits I often read "ADR Voice Casting" above these groups, sometimes I even read "ADR Cast" as a header. So I ask myself: If these aren't "Cast" then why are they casted? Quoting CubbyUps: Quote: But one thing I noticed from the screencaps. There is a credit about them for "ADR Voice Casting" or "Voice Casting". So there you go. Let's just take the filmmakers' word on it that they're cast, okay? And remember we tend to include MUCH vaguer things than this: use the CLT to look up what someone like Frank Welker is listed with as cast member in all kinds of profiles, for instance. Lots of things like "special vocal effects" and the like - often listed in exactly the same place as these "additional", "loop group" or "ADR" voices. Yet he is regularly entered, even by some of the users prominently featured in this thread. It's a rather strange double standard. |
| | T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting antolod: Quote: Casting, well, that would mean those voices were chosen (hired) because of the characteristics of the voice in question. Could be a particularly blood-curdling scream, or a maniacal laughter, but it is still a sound effect, and not a Cast Role they are hired for. Which is, indeed, what casting is. You've given a few audio-related examples, but it can just as well be a certain menacing look as well. Surely being cast for being able to provide a specific maniacal laughter doesn't change the fact that the person is being cast? That's exactly what casting is: looking for the right person to provide a certain something. Whether that something consists of a "regular", on-screen part with lots of dialogue, a two-second walk-on part with just a menacing look, or to provide a voice-only blood-curdling scream, doesn't matter. The person is still cast to provide just that. As for it being a sound effect: even if it is, we list those all the time. See my previous example about Frank Welker's multiple "special vocal effects" (and even more obscure) credits. Surely that's a lot less vague than something like "ADR Voices". How come one would qualify for inclusion, while the other would not? It just doesn't make sense. | | | Last edited: by T!M |
|
|
Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion |
Page:
1 2 3 4 ...13 Previous Next
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|