Quoting ruben.:

Quote:
Quoting AESP_pres:

Quote:
Quoting ruben.:

Quote:
"what player did you use to check?") goblinsdoitall what has the DVD player to do with the contribution. ?????

I'm not him, but. You mention it if you change the running time, the audio soundtrack or the video format for something different from what is written on the cover.

What about nero info tool or other software who can verified this you dont need the dvd for that

If you use Nero Info Tool or suchlike you can't be really sure if the runtime it shows is from the main feature or from some other track.
However, in your Contribution Notes you can specify what you used, whether a DVD player or some other software.

Quoting ruben.:

Quote:
Quoting AESP_pres:

Quote:
Quoting ruben.:

Quote:
"what player did you use to check?") goblinsdoitall what has the DVD player to do with the contribution. ?????

I'm not him, but. You mention it if you change the running time, the audio soundtrack or the video format for something different from what is written on the cover.

What about nero info tool or other software who can verified this you dont need the dvd for that

Without seeing the actual contribution notes it's really futile to speculate what, if anything, the DVD player has to do with anything.

Quoting EnryWiki:

Quote:
Out of curiosity! 

In my case, it was Jackie Brown (UK profile), 42 votes.
Second best Bones Season One (US profile), 40 votes.

In view of the occasion, what was the greatest number of votes/no-votes
you got on a single forum post, or contribution note?

Quoting bbbbb:

Quote:
Quoting goblinsdoitall:

Quote:

Quote:
I once got 51 correct yes-votes, and one funny-no-vote (from dear user SpaceFreakMicha, his counter-argument was "what player did you use to check?") and got it declined.

Believe me, the accuracy of a contribution means nothing with reference to 'Released' or 'Declined'.

The decision about acception or rejection of a profile is solely with the screeners, they may use the votes of the users as a guideline, but they don't have to.

The Screeners are always right, of course. Even when approving the very same contribution they declined some weeks ago.

Where did I say that a screener can't be wrong? They are only human after all. All I said and meant was that the rejection of your contribution didn't necessarily have something to do with the no vote.

EDIT: And as AESP_pres pointed out probably this was the correct decision.
EDIT AGAIN: Quoting usually means a full quote, or at least make clear that the quotation was shortened. So if you requote your posting and shorten mine I'd have at least expected  the international sign for abbreviations wich is "(...)"

Quoting goblinsdoitall:

Quote:
Quoting bbbbb:

Quote:
Quoting goblinsdoitall:

Quote:

Quote:
I once got 51 correct yes-votes, and one funny-no-vote (from dear user SpaceFreakMicha, his counter-argument was "what player did you use to check?") and got it declined.

Believe me, the accuracy of a contribution means nothing with reference to 'Released' or 'Declined'.

The decision about acception or rejection of a profile is solely with the screeners, they may use the votes of the users as a guideline, but they don't have to.

The Screeners are always right, of course. Even when approving the very same contribution they declined some weeks ago.

Where did I say that a screener can't be wrong? They are only human after all. All I said and meant was that the rejection of your contribution didn't necessarily have something to do with the no vote.

Now does that mean, you agree that the accuracy of a contribution means nothing with reference to 'Released' or 'Declined'?

Quote:
Quoting bbbbb:

Quote:
Quoting goblinsdoitall:

Quote:

Quote:

EDIT: And as AESP_pres pointed out probably this was the correct decision.

The first decision was wrong, the second decision correct: a modest result of 50%. I experienced it several times. Didn't try the other way thus far, though.

Quote:
Quoting bbbbb:

Quote:
Quoting goblinsdoitall:

Quote:

Quote:

EDIT AGAIN: Quoting usually means a full quote, or at least make clear that the quotation was shortened. So if you requote your posting and shorten mine I'd have at least expected  the international sign for abbreviations wich is "(...)"

If that really would be of importance to you, you would have had to criticise at least five persons earlier, alone in this topic.

Quoting bbbbb:

Quote:
Quoting goblinsdoitall:

Quote:
Quoting bbbbb:

Quote:
I once got 51 correct yes-votes, and one funny-no-vote (from dear user SpaceFreakMicha, his counter-argument was "what player did you use to check?") and got it declined.

Believe me, the accuracy of a contribution means nothing with reference to 'Released' or 'Declined'.

To verify about the usefulness of the "funny-no-vote" as you call it, it might have been helpful to specify the kind of change you made with your contribution.

I added a booklet to 'Other Features'.

If it's really this and no other changes were made, it really was a "funny no-vote". There's no obvious reason how a booklet and the player could be related.

As for your second question. I wouldn't say that the accuracy of a contribution means nothing, but for sure it doesn't mean everything.
An inaccurate contribution with a good contribution note might get released, whereas an accurate contribution might get declined because of insufficient verification.
But if you knowingly state false information as true, or as you said to AESP_pres:
Quoting bbbbb:

Quote:

Quote:
Always write 'Source: DVD', it doesn't matter where the datas are coming from.

Yes, that was a good advice, I'm sure it helped many users to get their correct contributions released.

you are making a mock out of it. Those who are concerned about accuracy surely will love your idea of sneaking in third party data. Not that it's necessarily false data, it might even be more correct than the existing profile, but if the data can't be verified by the DVD (credits or content) it's of no value for the database. Even worse, it might mess up the the datasets, for proof check the mess with the CLT (Credit Lookup Tool).

Quoting AESP_pres:

Quote:
Quoting bbbbb:

Quote:
Quoting AESP_pres:

So Mr. double P give it a rest.

Quote:
The name is quintuple b.

This is not a reference to your actual screen name or your old Wasserglas one, but one on the use of "Skippnet50" to personify someone else

[...]

Not just a very similar screen name, same avatar too. 

Quoting bbbbb:

Quote:
Not to forget the same tagline. Even the text was copied from the original, you cannot say I didn't
pay attention to detail.

In my opinion your walking on thin ice:  forum rules:

"Bannable" offenses include, but are not limited to, the following list of activities.  Users that are banned will be permanently prohibited from posting.  In severe cases, there will be no warnings for first time offenses.  There is no appeal process once banned.
Transmitting illegal, patently obscene, hateful, or racially derogatory content
Repeated harassment of another member
Impersonating an Invelos employee
Chain letters, pyramid, or money schemes
Discussion promoting DVD or CD piracy
Spamming