Author |
Message |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 21,610 |
| Posted: | | | | "As for the ADR comment: who says we don't include them? They're part of the cast: they're voice actors, and they're actually giving a "performance". Okay, so it's voice only, but that never stopped us before: we enter other voice only roles too. Heck, we even add dogs and cats sometimes!" ADR personnel are ALWAYS found in the Sound Section, they are NOT p[art of the cast listing unl;ess you have someone trying to create his own definiton of Cast so he can corrupt the database to HIS own purposes, such data is to be kept LOCAL only. So we have a user who professes to follow the Rules now making up his own. ADR Voices are NOT cast members they are part of the Sound dept. What is he going to add next Foley personnel. This user despite his public comments isd NOT following the Rules andhis arrogance is well reflected in his comment. lSkip | | | ASSUME NOTHING!!!!!! CBE, MBE, MoA and proud of it. Outta here
Billy Video | | | Last edited: by Winston Smith |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,819 |
| Posted: | | | | I totally agree with Skip on this one.
The rules even state: For the purposes of this section we define "standard" film credits as those where all credited actors involved are listed together in a single section at the end of the film
The very fact that ADR people are NOT listed with the other members of the cast means they should not be included. |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 17,334 |
| Posted: | | | | I agree per rules they should not be added to the cast if they are not with the cast list. | | | Pete |
|
Registered: June 12, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,665 |
| Posted: | | | | I concur, they are crew and don't belong in cast (except locally). | | | Bad movie? You're soaking in it! |
|
Registered: May 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,730 |
| Posted: | | | | Oooops, didn't think about that. Just contributed a bunch of ADR-group, following the line of this user, there were even some quite well known actors appearing in this list. Since it already got accepted, I will consequently change this back. Just one last comment: Skip, wasn't it you to tell us that Hollywood gives a f*** about our definitions? So it's really not for the sake of the discussion, but because I really don't understand it: Why exactly is someone who is giving a "Voice only"-performance not a member of the cast? I can still remember the discussion about " appearances" which were credited in the crew section and here it was widely accepted that these should belong to the cast. Where is the difference? | | | It all seems so stupid, it makes me want to give up! But why should I give up, when it all seems so stupid?
Registrant since 05/22/2003 | | | Last edited: by Lewis_Prothero |
|
| T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,736 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting goblinsdoitall: Quote: Why exactly is someone who is giving a "Voice only"-performance not a member of the cast? I'm afraid there's no answer to that one. Therefore, IMHO, they ARE members of the cast. They are, indeed, usually actors with several other credits in the database, often both voice-only and "regular" ones. Sure, we could go ahead and argue for pages over the level of importance of their job for the film, but I'd rather not. The fact of the matter remains that they did perform on the movie. Since these people also acted in various other films in my database, it seems only natural to track their voice-only credits as well. If you go looking for resumé's for some of these people, you'll find they do the same thing. Quote: I can still remember the discussion about "appearances" which were credited in the crew section and here it was widely accepted that these should belong to the cast. Where is the difference? There is none. And everybody here knows that perfectly well, which is why I predict this particular aspect will be completely ignored by everyone else here - except maybe for the few that are willing to throw that data overboard as well. Quote: there were even some quite well known actors appearing in this list. Indeed, which is exactly why it's interesting data to have. Also, it's a lot less work for the few users that don't like to have it to remove them from their local profiles, than it is for the rest of the userbase to have to add them all in themselves. | | | Last edited: by T!M |
|
| Berak | Bibamus morieundum est! |
Registered: May 10, 2007 | Posts: 1,059 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Dr Pavlov: Quote: "As for the ADR comment: who says we don't include them? They're part of the cast: they're voice actors, and they're actually giving a "performance". Okay, so it's voice only, but that never stopped us before: we enter other voice only roles too. Heck, we even add dogs and cats sometimes!"
ADR personnel are ALWAYS found in the Sound Section, they are NOT p[art of the cast listing unl;ess you have someone trying to create his own definiton of Cast so he can corrupt the database to HIS own purposes, such data is to be kept LOCAL only.
So we have a user who professes to follow the Rules now making up his own. ADR Voices are NOT cast members they are part of the Sound dept. What is he going to add next Foley personnel.
This user despite his public comments isd NOT following the Rules andhis arrogance is well reflected in his comment.
lSkip I agree 100%. I've been hammered by T!M in his contribution notes several time for voting no on his extremely subjective data and lack of documentation. He even goes as far as calling me a liar in his notes. Unfortunately he seems to have some merit with the screeners, as most of his garbage get accepted. edited | | | Berak
It's better to burn out than to fade away! True love conquers all! | | | Last edited: by Forum Moderator |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 20,111 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting Pantheon: Quote: I totally agree with Skip on this one.
The rules even state: For the purposes of this section we define "standard" film credits as those where all credited actors involved are listed together in a single section at the end of the film
The very fact that ADR people are NOT listed with the other members of the cast means they should not be included. I completely agree. If they're not credited with the main actors, they should be left out. | | | Corey |
|
Registered: June 12, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 2,665 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting T!M: Quote: Also, it's a lot less work for the few users that don't like to have it to remove them from their local profiles, than it is for the rest of the userbase to have to add them all in themselves. On what basis do you assume it's the few who don't like them and the many who do? I hope it is more than approval of profile changes. That would hardly qualify as a mandate. I suspect a well argued and documented submission to remove ADR voices would be just as successful as one that added them. | | | Bad movie? You're soaking in it! |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Posts: 2,366 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting goblinsdoitall: Quote: Why exactly is someone who is giving a "Voice only"-performance not a member of the cast? I think it's because their voices are merrily borrowed to replace certain lines ( dubbing) of the actual cast members as opposed to "Additional Voices" which are cast who are specifficaly selected for a complete role. But although they aren't really cast I agree with Tim it wouldn't hurt to add them, because as with uncredited "actors" they also "perform" a part where the first one can only be heard and the last one can only be seen. | | | Martin Zuidervliet
DVD Profiler Nederlands | | | Last edited: by Daddy DVD |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 844 |
| |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,946 |
| Posted: | | | | I would leave them out. If we keep going like this, in a few years we'll be entering the complete credits of a movie, and we have a full day's work to create just one profile. For me, the rule is fine as it is. Just the main cast. | | | View my collection at http://www.chriskepolis.be/home/dvd.htm
Chris |
|
Registered: March 28, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 1,299 |
| Posted: | | | | This is the first I hear of any of this, but I do like the idea of including ADR performers in the cast listing. As someone said, I think it'd be interesting information to have. It might even be nice to have an ADR checkbox (similar to the voice checkbox) just to separate them.
That being said, I do agree that it's against the current set of rules.
Which makes me wonder if perhaps a new thread in the Contribution Rules forum is in order? I'd be happy to start it myself, but since I only just heard about this topic I'll leave it for someone else to do. I suppose if no one's done it in a few days I'll do it then.
KM | | | Tags, tags, bo bags, banana fana fo fags, mi my mo mags, TAGS! Dolly's not alone. You can also clone profiles. You've got questions? You've got answers? Take the DVD Profiler Wiki for a spin. | | | Last edited: by Astrakan |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,745 |
| |
Registered: March 19, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 6,018 |
| Posted: | | | | editted | | | Last edited: by Forum Moderator |
|
| Berak | Bibamus morieundum est! |
Registered: May 10, 2007 | Posts: 1,059 |
| Posted: | | | | editted Sorry - don't know how else to properly explain it... | | | Berak
It's better to burn out than to fade away! True love conquers all! | | | Last edited: by Forum Moderator |
|